[ad_1]
Schoch noted that artist Ahmed Rizk “did not handle his son’s crisis professionally, being the one who bought the bike for him in the first place and allowed him to ride it without a license. The treatment of the courier, who was only concerned with treating his son and didn’t even attend the funeral, is a matter of concern.”
He added that the civil claim against the artist “is due to his negligence in raising his son and allowing him to drive an unlicensed motorcycle while he had not yet reached his 18th birthday and did not have a driver’s license,” the Cairo 24 website posted on Wednesday.
In the same context, the Cairo Court of Appeal has scheduled for September 5 the opening of the first trial of the son of the artist Ahmed Rizk, who is accused of running over a delivery man with his motorcycle, causing his death after attempts to treat him failed.
Ahmed Rizk has remained silent since the incident and has not spoken about what happened to his son. In the past few weeks, during the investigation by the Public Prosecutor’s Office in October, he accompanied his son to the police station, during which the Public Prosecutor’s Office was unable to hear his voice because the victim was unconscious and he was unable to make a statement.
Last May, security services detained artist Ahmed Rizk after his son hit a delivery man with his bicycle, injuring him.
Investigating authorities released the artist’s son, Ahmed Rizk, on bail of £5,000 after accusing him of causing the deliveryman’s injury and returning to claim him after the deliveryman’s death.
[ad_2]
Source link
