[ad_1]
Martin Becerra explain Javier Miley Trying to categorise the media as part of caste, Make journalists collectively responsible for the situation in the country and discipline “any voice that questions or criticizes the president’s work.” In addition, researchers and media experts detailed Modo Fontevecchiago through online TV, Introduction to Radio (AM 1190) Radio Amadeus (FM 91.1) Large digital platforms control, censor, and make certain accounts visible: “They are the editors of public and private conversations.”
Martín Becerra is an expert in media and cultural industries. He is a professor at the National University of Quilmes and the University of Buenos Aires, a researcher at Conicet and a columnist for different media.
What is the relationship between the expenditures set aside by SIDE, the application of artificial intelligence by the Ministry of Security, the modus operandi of the so-called “troll farm” of the government and the attacks on the opposition and journalists?
Dictators don’t like this.
Professional and critical journalism practice is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That is why it troubles those who think they are in possession of the truth.
What they all have in common is opacity, or a lack of transparency. Javier Miley arrive side By definition, it is unquestionable, just like Artificial Intelligence Technology The new unit you just created Patricia Burridge and published in the Official Gazette.
It is opaque because There is no standard for describing training AIMoreover, the purpose of this AI unit is so vague that it would make Borges smile. To give us an idea, the published resolution says that they will patrol social networks, applications and Internet sites, that is, the entire digital universe. Of course, no country in the world, neither China nor the United States, Possess the ability and qualifications to patrol the entire Internet. They want to do it, but they can’t.
On the other hand, the announcement that this new unit will predict future criminal behavior is very serious because It abolished the presumption of innocence guaranteed by our Constitution.and violated the private and personal communications of 46 million Argentines.
In addition, there is a troll farm, which is a digital gang that installs fake news and Amplified the President’s attacks and the attitudes of some of his key collaborators toward opponents and journalists, whose reporting in some cases barely deviates from the official line. There is “capability” in the sense of “which institutions have the ability to conduct control, surveillance and monitoring of digital networks”, and today, They are fundamental areas of the president’s work and public dialogue..
Do you think that there is a deliberate attempt to position journalism as part of the opposition and “caste”, regardless of the nuance or criticism of the president?
This is a clear goal and It’s not even very originalPlease copy the recipe Donald TrumpJust look at Trump’s interview with the Black Journalists Association. Milley being part of a caste confuses the media and journalists Seek to make them jointly responsible for the current state of affairs. In addition, it has a subsequent goal of restraining any voice that questions or criticizes the president’s work.
In this sense, I do not see a paradox in the public debate; Much of the attack by the president and his entourage was endorsed and republished by many journalists and the media, which are very important in the audience. For example, among others, the victims of official harassment are Maria O’DonnellShe was attacked not only by the president directly (which was very serious), but also by colleagues who applauded the president and amplified his harassment.
National governments must stop advocating violence and promote dialogue
Pablo Corso: How do you think this advert can prevent future crimes, as we have already seen in the novel Minority Report? On the other hand, if the state does not control, who should?
predicting future behavior and determining whether it will be criminal, Not in line with the constitutional principle of presumption of innocencethe privacy and inviolability of communications. It is complex legally, but even if it were not complex, democratic coexistence is complex and impossible to do well. If the excuse is that the state must expand its repressive capacity to curb crime, It won’t do this with AI tools that predict future behavior..
As you quoted in Minority Report, There is an original bias in the training basis of artificial intelligence, which leads to the conclusions drawn in the order of probability.But the fact that residents of particular neighborhoods are more likely to commit crimes or become victims cannot be verified.
I wrote a note citing a very interesting precedent in 2018 when Juan Manuel Utubey, the former governor of Salta, proposed an AI tool to predict teenage pregnancy. This ended up being a scandal because the state-owned database was prone to errors and was inaudible. Leads to obvious class bias and contradicts constitutional principles.
On the other hand, regarding the question of who controls, I think it should be the state, but today they also control large digital platforms that can censor or make public certain accounts. They are editors of public and private conversations.
The state should exercise control, but according to democratic standards, not based on a vaguely defined presumption of guilt. AI As Minister Burridge has said, it should be controlled according to our constitutional principles, namely, the inviolability of communications, the presumption of innocence, Preventing AI tools from running into security or migration issues.
FM Radio
[ad_2]
Source link
