[ad_1]
Hamas said that “its leadership listened to calm mediators’ accounts of what happened recently at the Rome conference on ceasefire negotiations and prisoner exchanges,” stressing that “Netanyahu has returned to his strategy of delaying, stalling and evading a deal.”
“Netanyahu has put forward new conditions and demands, he has withdrawn what the mediators conveyed as an Israeli document that was part of the project of US President Joe Biden and later part of the UN Security Council resolution,” she said in a statement.
Israel Amendment
“Israel’s revised proposal includes references to the Philadelphia and Nezarim axes, in addition to a request for the names of living prisoners to be released in the first phase of the deal,” said Israel’s official broadcaster Kan.
It also includes “control over the return of displaced persons to the north, Israel’s vision for the Philadelphia Axis, and Israel’s veto over the status of prisoners Hamas demands for release.”
Kan said there was “no mention of ousting Hamas from power in Gaza” in the new Israeli amendment, adding that it “vaguely allows the movement to maintain its rule over the Gaza Strip, while the new proposal also allows Israel to return to war if it wishes.”
Obstacles facing Hamas
Political analyst Talal Okar said, “The military pressure plan is reinforced by the fact that the Benjamin Netanyahu government is not interested in reaching a ceasefire agreement with Hamas, especially since it controls the region and is making progress at the expense of the movement and its armed wing.”
He explained to the Erem News website that “Netanyahu realizes that Hamas needs to reach an agreement with Israel to prevent the destruction of the entire Gaza Strip and give Israel an opportunity to regain control of the Gaza Strip,” noting that Netanyahu is taking advantage of this.
Okar explained that “Israel is setting up obstacles and presenting new conditions to force Hamas to make more concessions and is trying to use the situation on the ground in the Gaza Strip to achieve this goal,” noting that Hamas will not accept Israel’s new conditions.
Israel is likely to increase pressure on Hamas, which will refuse to make any concessions on the new ceasefire conditions, which could trigger a confrontation between the two sides of the Gaza conflict and lead to the failure of the mediator’s mission. ”
Okar pointed out that “the failure of the armistice negotiations depends on the pressure the United States put on Israel to comply with the UN Security Council resolution, which was originally proposed by Israeli President Joe Biden,” and stressed that if the US pressure is successful, Israel will reach a temporary agreement to negotiate a ceasefire.
Mediator’s efforts failed
Political analyst Ali Jabawi said, for his part, that “Israel’s attempt to impose new conditions on Hamas is an attempt to thwart the mediators’ efforts to reach a temporary agreement,” noting that this was in line with the demands of the right-wing parties in Netanyahu’s coalition.
He added on the Erem News website that “Netanyahu is doing this to achieve two basic things. The first is to preserve his government coalition and prevent it from collapsing, especially in light of the threats by Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich to withdraw their forces if a deal is reached.”
“The second goal is to put pressure on Hamas to either accept the new conditions, which would be a major defeat for Hamas, or to withdraw from the ceasefire negotiations, thereby accusing it of thwarting the region’s attempts to reach a temporary agreement,” Jabawi noted.
He believes that “the new conditions are something Netanyahu is evading in order to buy more time so that he can accept the formula of a temporary agreement during the parliamentary recess and prevent the loss of his political future and the collapse of the government coalition, even temporarily.”
In this case, “Netanyahu will be able to reverse the political equation and he will have the opportunity to bring his right-wing partners back into his government coalition or find an alternative to them,” Jarbawi noted, noting that all options are open and the matter depends on the pressure from the mediators.
[ad_2]
Source link
