[ad_1]
In less than 24 hours, the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights (Minjusdh) received two conflicting reports The feasibility of a congressionally approved opinion on the scope of crimes against humanity.
These are two documents with the same number, number 227-2024, sent by the director of criminological affairs of the Minjusdh, Lucía Nuñovero Cisneros, to the deputy secretary of justice, Juan Alcántara Medrano, according to Punto Final.
look here: Two Minjus reports consider laws limiting the scope of crimes against humanity “feasible”
The first report was sent on July 9, indicating the signing of the law “It turns out that’s not feasible.”as it can be seen from the ruling of the Constitutional Court (TC) that the statute of limitations does not apply in cases of crimes against humanity.
Surprisingly, 24 hours later we sent a second document, dated July 10, which read: “The Constitutional Court’s ruling makes it clear that the statute of limitations does not apply in cases of crimes against humanity”.
look here: Minister Arana on the law limiting the scope of crimes against humanity: “Technical opinion issued”
Asked if she was asked to change her technical opinion on the ruling, Nuno Vero Cisneros denied it, saying the report was not binding on the executive branch to approve the specification.
“They did not ask me to change my decision because neither this report nor other technical reports from the various branches of the Ministry of Justice are conclusive, nor do they have greater binding force on the legislative outcome of the Congress of the Republic, which is ultimately the power to legislate,” he said.
Report declaration feasibility
According to this newspaper, the company’s technical team prepared two reports Mingjusd consider “feasible” Sign laws that limit the scope of crime, then Crimes against humanity and war crimes.
The first legal report of the Directorate General for Regulatory Development and Regulatory Quality states that the content of the legal provisions is protected by the legislative power of Congress.
look here: CAL urges executive branch to comply with Congressional-approved Crimes Against Humanity Signature
For its part, the technical report of the Directorate-General for Criminological Affairs states that the signing of the law is “It is possible through observation”.
However, he said “The application of the principle of criminal non-retroactivity is wrong because it does not take into account the full range of international legal instruments and national and international jurisprudence” On crimes against humanity.
[ad_2]
Source link
