[ad_1]
In France, the decrees implementing the immigration law published in the Official Gazette in July this year have attracted attention. A French public law expert found that they concretize all the regressive characteristics of French public law. immigration law. explain.
Just before the end of the Gabriel Attal government, the outgoing executive’s Ministry of the Interior issued a series of decrees on asylum, immigration and integration. These decrees are intended to implement several provisions of the Immigration Law of 26 January 2024.
according to Enough mediaThe first decree was to be issued in the middle of the campaign for the legislative elections on July 2. But for obvious reasons, given the tense political environment, the government postponed the publication of the decree in the Official Gazette until July 14.
Foreigners must sign a “contract” to obtain or retain a residence permit
On July 16, six other decrees were issued implementing the Immigration Law, which is undoubtedly the most restrictive law on the rights of foreigners and was voted on by the National Assembly last January.
Of all these decrees, the most questionable is decree 2024-811, which concerns the contract of commitment to respect republican principles required of applicants for residence permits, said Serge Slama, professor of public law at the university, cited by the same media as the University of Grenoble-Alpes.
Implementing provisions of immigration laws and decrees Regarding residence permitforeigners who are asked to provide this document must promise to respect the “principles of the Republic”. This also concerns holders of residence permits, who risk having their permit revoked if they do not comply with these principles.
In the appendix, the article clearly defines seven principles that every foreigner in France must abide by through a sworn statement. They are: “Personal liberty, freedom of expression and conscience, equality of men and women, human dignity, the motto and symbols of the Republic, territorial integrity and secularism.”
“This contract is the sword of Damocles hanging over the heads of all foreigners staying in France”
The measure is considered restrictive for foreigners and could generate a large number of undocumented immigrants, especially since failure to comply with these principles can result in quite severe consequences for foreigners.
For Serge Slama, this “contract is a sword of Damocles hanging over any foreigner who remains in France, whatever their status”.
He believes that the danger is that failure to comply with these principles will become an easy excuse to question a foreigner’s right to residency. “If we are not careful, more and more foreigners will be identified as illegal immigrants by counties,” the lawyer warned.
Arguing that learning the values of the republic should never be done through prohibition but rather through compliance, he predicted that “disputes over administrative jurisdiction will increase.”
Basically, Serge Slama argues that by requiring applicants and residence permit holders to sign this contract, the government is “asking foreigners living in France to be better citizens than the French citizens themselves.”
[ad_2]
Source link
