[ad_1]
Contents
Muslims will not be happy with you unless you follow their religious beliefsIsmail Iskandarani(1)The proponents of each faith believe that what they believe is clear and unambiguous truth, while their opponents believe in confusing and fiery lies. There is certainly nothing wrong with this, for in relative practical matters there may be many right things, and there may be right and wrong, but in absolute doctrinal matters, from every free point of view, right is one and wrong is many. A person with a will.The Quran states that “Neither the Jews nor the Christians will be satisfied with you unless you follow their religion,” which Muslims understand as a condemnation of those who interfere with the beliefs of others and deny them the right to believe in anything they want. Although many verses of the Quran proclaim pluralism and diversity and focus on differences as eternal human nature, for some reason that I do not understand, Muslims of this era believe that they have the right to preach their religion in different countries. They strongly oppose the freedom to spread other beliefs in non-Muslim majority countries.The rudest of them apparently quoted verses from the Quran and texts from the Sunnah, while the most moderate of them tried to justify it from a socio-political perspective, not even a socio-religious perspective, i.e. “Inciting rebellion.” Religious activities in Muslim communities can cause riots, storms, volcanoes and earthquakes. I don’t know where the logic lies when Muslims around the world erupt in anger at the treatment of their Rohingya brothers in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, even though most Buddhists see them as a threat to the fabric of society. Do they accept the conclusion of an agreement between the Organization of the Islamic Conference and the Myanmar authorities to guarantee freedom of belief for religious minorities? Or are Buddhist workers in the Gulf countries the children of black ducks? !With all their arrogance and hubris, the Muslims of this era rejoiced at stories of Europeans and Americans flocking to the religion of Allah, without mosques being closed, Qurans being confiscated, or missionaries who might be non-citizen visitors being arrested. At the same time, they viewed any missionary activity by Christians in their countries of origin as dangerous Christianization, threatening the state and society and fulfilling the diplomatic agenda of the Zionist Crusades.(2)The website “Misr Al Arabiya” published a report titled (“Christianization” outside the Assaf Book Fair) on Wednesday, February 5, 2014. Editorial colleague’s choice of ‘Christian’ description sums up Muslim majority views Egypt distributes Bibles as free gifts during book fair, despite colleagues committing professional sin in publishing on a subject that is supposed to be professional rather than opinion material . Interestingly, Muslims consider Christians to be “people of books,” yet they are wary of distributing the book, even during the breaks of exhibitions where books of all colors and types are sold. I wonder what pricked the editor’s ears when this Christian girl said to her, “It’s important for us to understand each other,” as she described it? ! What is so special about the simple phrase that the Quran tells Muslims about creating peoples and tribes in order to understand one another?The use of the word “Christianization” to replace the word “evangelization” for spreading the good news or calling for Christianity has its key roots in the practices of colonial religious missionaries, which critics viewed as blackmailing Muslims and other pagans in Africa and Asia. Forcing them to spread Christianity by force. Spread Christianity. In fact, according to this view, the conservative Coptic Orthodox Church may be more cautious and wary of Western Catholic missions. But, as usual, these terms are as separate from the reasons for examining them as frankincense in the mouths of fools.The report published on the website of “Misr Al Arabiya”, in a language full of worry and concern, suggests that Christian girls kidnap Muslim children at the church gates and force them to convert to Christianity in church orphanages. Since most Muslims consider the distribution of a luxurious Bible as a gift to be an abomination that must be prohibited, this editorial colleague did not hesitate to point out the description of Christian girls and Christian girls to those who are jealous of their religion. The name of one of them, as well as the location of the book distribution exhibition at the “ambulance” station, opened the door to all stupid possibilities.Thank God, the crime withdrawn by the site’s management was publishing a photo of a Christian girl with a clear face, while blurring the face of a veiled girl who helped the editors in their “dangerous investigative” work. Of course, this ridiculous report conducts no investigation and does not reek of professionalism or journalism; instead, it is closer to irresponsible demagoguery than anything else. Thank God, the exhibition ended successfully without any stupid incident that could have destabilized the already collapsed socio-political situation and pushed it into the abyss of sectarian strife, filled with hateful language in unprofessional reports published by my site . Proud to write for. As the Saadi people say, “A big mistake is a big mistake,” so as I imagined the consequences of releasing a report in this form, I tried to put the dark scenario out of my mind.(3)In the epistemological sense, proponents of the authenticity of Islamic knowledge roar that the highest value in the Muslim civilization hierarchy is justice, not freedom as in Western civilization. I am really surprised by the application of the concept of justice by religious activists who believe in universalism and humanity rather than localism or nationalism, because they see themselves as entitled to support Muslims in Angola while being jealous of the Vatican’s statements defending the presence of Christianity in Iraq and Syria, or in the Middle East in general.Most of the people mourning Muslims in Angola or the initiators of massacres of Muslims in Central Africa do not know that there are Muslims in these two countries or where they are on the brown map. Although the presence of Christianity in Iraq and the Levant and its diversity of sects and sects was considered a stain on the centuries-old history of Muslims, Muslims of this era did not care that this mole turned into an unprecedented stain on history because They focus on more important things. It is as if there is an ideological war that aspires to be simplified, in which economic, political, and national motivations hide behind our monopoly of ideological rights in order to combat ideological lies shared by all others.Do Muslims of this era accept a global religious union in which the religious rights of all people are guaranteed and their freedoms protected, regardless of their numbers or proportions in any country? Do Muslims believe in their arguments and the truth they claim, and are their preachers best prepared for debate and debate? Do Muslims of this era understand the verse “argue with them in the best way” to mean “exhort them in the best way”? What’s the point of arguing if you monopolize the right to speak and force the other person to listen? Do Muslims of this age really believe that the One whom the revelation commemorates will preserve it, or will opening the door to religious freedom befall the pillars of Islam and true religion will collapse?I learned from the hadith of the Prophet – may Allah bless him and grant him peace – “Unless he loves his brother, you will not believe” and unless I love my fellow man, my belief is not complete. I myself like the guidance of the Qur’an and this is what Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali said when explaining the forty hadith of the Nawawi, quoting Imam Ali ibn Abi Ta The words of Lieb – may Allah glorify him – “People are of two types; you are brothers in religion and you are equal in creation.” I don’t understand why some of them interpret this as a reference to God’s creation of guardianship and decide what is appropriate for them to hear or discuss? !(4)He said to me, “If you knew a marijuana seller was offering your son his wares, would you let him try it or discuss it?” He was absolutely convinced that I would be confused, or that I would follow his classic Marxist analogy, He wasn’t thinking about religious advocacy like marijuana and opium. But I confused him by saying that if I used force to stop my son, I would be a failed, undemocratic father.He insisted on continuing the argument from this narrow point of view so I answered him that I will be careful and when God bless me with children my son will be bolder than drug dealers and his confidence will be enough for him to fight them and call them to Do what he thinks is good and right. But I am not blind to the dangers of questioning this paternalistic logic, which both Islamists and nationalists have internalized in their view of the state as the guardian of its children and subjects rather than the behavior of its citizens.Here we move from discussing the position of Muslim-majority societies on the freedom to advocate for other faiths to a clash with the expectations of the state by ideologues according to their authoritarian conceptions. In the imagination of Islamists and nationalists, the state is a moral state, a mother that children must respect rather than be angry at, because it knows best how to improve the affairs of boys and girls, the living and the dead. It therefore centrally controls thought and educational curricula and monitors publications in mass media before and after publication. This is certainly a conservative state that worries about its children crossing the street alone and takes measures and policies to ensure that they go to bed early after brushing their teeth with a toothpick or a brush so that they get up early to drink a full glass of milk.There is a huge arrogance behind these reactionary views of the “Nina” state, which ignores the prosperity of communication and communication technology. Mostly, these delusional defenders know quite a few atheists and those who are addicted to watching sexual materials through international information networks, but they try to convince us of what they have failed to convince us of, namely that the “Tita Haja” state can elevate society. It is completely absurd that someone uses the word “revolution” to describe these words.(5)My weekly article on the “Masr Al Arabiya” website is a paid opinion piece and any unprofessional descriptions mentioned in the article are my own opinions and I thank the website for allowing me to publish them. All colleagues have the highest respect.Share this topic:relatedNavigate between topics
Muslims will not be happy with you unless you follow their religious beliefs
This opinion piece was published on the Masr Al Arabiya website on Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at the link:
Ismail Iskandarani
(1)
The proponents of each faith believe that what they believe is clear and unambiguous truth, while their opponents believe in confusing and fiery lies. There is certainly nothing wrong with this, for in relative practical matters there may be many right things, and there may be right and wrong, but in absolute doctrinal matters, from every free point of view, right is one and wrong is many. A person with a will.
The Quran states that “Neither the Jews nor the Christians will be satisfied with you unless you follow their religion,” which Muslims understand as a condemnation of those who interfere with the beliefs of others and deny them the right to believe in anything they want. Although many verses of the Quran proclaim pluralism and diversity and focus on differences as eternal human nature, for some reason that I do not understand, Muslims of this era believe that they have the right to preach their religion in different countries. They strongly oppose the freedom to spread other beliefs in non-Muslim majority countries.
The rudest of them apparently quoted verses from the Quran and texts from the Sunnah, while the most moderate of them tried to justify it from a socio-political perspective, not even a socio-religious perspective, i.e. “Inciting rebellion.” Religious activities in Muslim communities can cause riots, storms, volcanoes and earthquakes. I don’t know where the logic lies when Muslims around the world erupt in anger at the treatment of their Rohingya brothers in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, even though most Buddhists see them as a threat to the fabric of society. Do they accept the conclusion of an agreement between the Organization of the Islamic Conference and the Myanmar authorities to guarantee freedom of belief for religious minorities? Or are Buddhist workers in the Gulf countries the children of black ducks? !
With all their arrogance and hubris, the Muslims of this era rejoiced at stories of Europeans and Americans flocking to the religion of Allah, without mosques being closed, Qurans being confiscated, or missionaries who might be non-citizen visitors being arrested. At the same time, they viewed any missionary activity by Christians in their countries of origin as dangerous Christianization, threatening the state and society and fulfilling the diplomatic agenda of the Zionist Crusades.
(2)
The website “Misr Al Arabiya” published a report titled (“Christianization” outside the Assaf Book Fair) on Wednesday, February 5, 2014. Editorial colleague’s choice of ‘Christian’ description sums up Muslim majority views Egypt distributes Bibles as free gifts during book fair, despite colleagues committing professional sin in publishing on a subject that is supposed to be professional rather than opinion material . Interestingly, Muslims consider Christians to be “people of books,” yet they are wary of distributing the book, even during the breaks of exhibitions where books of all colors and types are sold. I wonder what pricked the editor’s ears when this Christian girl said to her, “It’s important for us to understand each other,” as she described it? ! What is so special about the simple phrase that the Quran tells Muslims about creating peoples and tribes in order to understand one another?
The use of the word “Christianization” to replace the word “evangelization” for spreading the good news or calling for Christianity has its key roots in the practices of colonial religious missionaries, which critics viewed as blackmailing Muslims and other pagans in Africa and Asia. Forcing them to spread Christianity by force. Spread Christianity. In fact, according to this view, the conservative Coptic Orthodox Church may be more cautious and wary of Western Catholic missions. But, as usual, these terms are as separate from the reasons for examining them as frankincense in the mouths of fools.
The report published on the website of “Misr Al Arabiya”, in a language full of worry and concern, suggests that Christian girls kidnap Muslim children at the church gates and force them to convert to Christianity in church orphanages. Since most Muslims consider the distribution of a luxurious Bible as a gift to be an abomination that must be prohibited, this editorial colleague did not hesitate to point out the description of Christian girls and Christian girls to those who are jealous of their religion. The name of one of them, as well as the location of the book distribution exhibition at the “ambulance” station, opened the door to all stupid possibilities.
Thank God, the crime withdrawn by the site’s management was publishing a photo of a Christian girl with a clear face, while blurring the face of a veiled girl who helped the editors in their “dangerous investigative” work. Of course, this ridiculous report conducts no investigation and does not reek of professionalism or journalism; instead, it is closer to irresponsible demagoguery than anything else. Thank God, the exhibition ended successfully without any stupid incident that could have destabilized the already collapsed socio-political situation and pushed it into the abyss of sectarian strife, filled with hateful language in unprofessional reports published by my site . Proud to write for. As the Saadi people say, “A big mistake is a big mistake,” so as I imagined the consequences of releasing a report in this form, I tried to put the dark scenario out of my mind.
(3)
In the epistemological sense, proponents of the authenticity of Islamic knowledge roar that the highest value in the Muslim civilization hierarchy is justice, not freedom as in Western civilization. I am really surprised by the application of the concept of justice by religious activists who believe in universalism and humanity rather than localism or nationalism, because they see themselves as entitled to support Muslims in Angola while being jealous of the Vatican’s statements defending the presence of Christianity in Iraq and Syria, or in the Middle East in general.
Most of the people mourning Muslims in Angola or the initiators of massacres of Muslims in Central Africa do not know that there are Muslims in these two countries or where they are on the brown map. Although the presence of Christianity in Iraq and the Levant and its diversity of sects and sects was considered a stain on the centuries-old history of Muslims, Muslims of this era did not care that this mole turned into an unprecedented stain on history because They focus on more important things. It is as if there is an ideological war that aspires to be simplified, in which economic, political, and national motivations hide behind our monopoly of ideological rights in order to combat ideological lies shared by all others.
Do Muslims of this era accept a global religious union in which the religious rights of all people are guaranteed and their freedoms protected, regardless of their numbers or proportions in any country? Do Muslims believe in their arguments and the truth they claim, and are their preachers best prepared for debate and debate? Do Muslims of this era understand the verse “argue with them in the best way” to mean “exhort them in the best way”? What’s the point of arguing if you monopolize the right to speak and force the other person to listen? Do Muslims of this age really believe that the One whom the revelation commemorates will preserve it, or will opening the door to religious freedom befall the pillars of Islam and true religion will collapse?
I learned from the hadith of the Prophet – may Allah bless him and grant him peace – “Unless he loves his brother, you will not believe” and unless I love my fellow man, my belief is not complete. I myself like the guidance of the Qur’an and this is what Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali said when explaining the forty hadith of the Nawawi, quoting Imam Ali ibn Abi Ta The words of Lieb – may Allah glorify him – “People are of two types; you are brothers in religion and you are equal in creation.” I don’t understand why some of them interpret this as a reference to God’s creation of guardianship and decide what is appropriate for them to hear or discuss? !
(4)
He said to me, “If you knew a marijuana seller was offering your son his wares, would you let him try it or discuss it?” He was absolutely convinced that I would be confused, or that I would follow his classic Marxist analogy, He wasn’t thinking about religious advocacy like marijuana and opium. But I confused him by saying that if I used force to stop my son, I would be a failed, undemocratic father.
He insisted on continuing the argument from this narrow point of view so I answered him that I will be careful and when God bless me with children my son will be bolder than drug dealers and his confidence will be enough for him to fight them and call them to Do what he thinks is good and right. But I am not blind to the dangers of questioning this paternalistic logic, which both Islamists and nationalists have internalized in their view of the state as the guardian of its children and subjects rather than the behavior of its citizens.
Here we move from discussing the position of Muslim-majority societies on the freedom to advocate for other faiths to a clash with the expectations of the state by ideologues according to their authoritarian conceptions. In the imagination of Islamists and nationalists, the state is a moral state, a mother that children must respect rather than be angry at, because it knows best how to improve the affairs of boys and girls, the living and the dead. It therefore centrally controls thought and educational curricula and monitors publications in mass media before and after publication. This is certainly a conservative state that worries about its children crossing the street alone and takes measures and policies to ensure that they go to bed early after brushing their teeth with a toothpick or a brush so that they get up early to drink a full glass of milk.
There is a huge arrogance behind these reactionary views of the “Nina” state, which ignores the prosperity of communication and communication technology. Mostly, these delusional defenders know quite a few atheists and those who are addicted to watching sexual materials through international information networks, but they try to convince us of what they have failed to convince us of, namely that the “Tita Haja” state can elevate society. It is completely absurd that someone uses the word “revolution” to describe these words.
(5)
My weekly article on the “Masr Al Arabiya” website is a paid opinion piece and any unprofessional descriptions mentioned in the article are my own opinions and I thank the website for allowing me to publish them. All colleagues have the highest respect.
This entry was posted on Saturday, August 9, 2014 at 6:41 pm and is filed under Social Issues, criticism of popular ideas, sectarian issuesYou can follow any responses to this entry by RSS 2.0 Feeding.you can Leave a Replyor trace back From your own website.
[ad_2]
Source link
