[ad_1]
Oskar Ounninen
Iltalehti columnist Oskari Onninen wrote that the bigger the Finnish operators are, the more they can mix and screw up without real sanctions.
This was the scene of the massacre on Friday, August 23rd. Ali Tauriainen
That’s how it is. It’s always the same thing.
More than a week ago, police announced that they were investigating a serious conservation crime: thousands of highly endangered river pearl mussels were killed in Stora Enso’s logging area in Somusalmi, despite clear instructions.
Initially, the company apologized but claimed that the investigation was ongoing and it could not make any additional comment on the matter.
Soon, the company’s forest chief arrived, apologized, promised explanations, and demanded more apologies.
Monday, CEO Hans Solstrom Already flown to Suomussalmi – “It looks bad, really bad”. The company pledged to suspend logging in sensitive forests and waters until the logging plans were reviewed.
Somewhere, a cash register in a crisis communications office is clanging away, tapping out the gross national product of, hopefully, Finland.
Asking for forgiveness was easy because Stora Enso was convinced that, despite the criminal proceedings, the company would not suffer any real harm from the mass destruction of endangered mussels.
The company’s stock price has been rising steadily since last week.
Equity Strategist Jukka Oksahajyu evaluate In Amulehti’s view, “citizen feedback” and “some commotion” — how stock strategists phrase alleged environmental crimes of this magnitude — don’t exactly affect share prices.
Significant financial sanctions and compensation demands or tighter regulation could have an impact, but investors clearly do not trust these measures to be implemented.
This is how it works in Finland.
Despite this, Finland often ranks first when measuring the least corrupt countries in the world.
The corruption cases are not financially serious, but they are the exception and therefore big news, which can only mean good news for Finland.
The corruption exposed in Finland often reads like a comedy about skilled financial criminals.
The official asked the Berry entrepreneur to pay for his child’s violin.
Another entrepreneur sells cheap pole vaulting equipment and videos to the city of Kerava.
Titi Eli Vicari Stealing airline points.
But the bigger the scale of the operator screw-ups and scams, the harder it is to imagine the crooks being kept under control. The end result is a peculiar moral decay that is a blind spot in Finnish society.
This spring, six times more information was stolen from the city of Helsinki than from Vastamo, but even the thought of sanctions against those who neglected their duties makes me laugh and cry.
Recently, the same city, the most functional city in the world, was named Ordered An information system worth 32 million euros was built by an honest Finnish company but never completed. The same money could provide nearly a year’s worth of services to teenagers.
Even if Helsinki failed to pay its employees for several months, Sössijäs was still protected by a large enough organizational structure.
We also know how to do it privately. Financial regulators are repeatedly Issues related to money laundering controls were pointed out to Osuuspankki, but no responsible party could be found.
Now everyone can think about what miracles, in such a cruel case, can give Stora Enso a reason to care about endangered nature in the future.
Taking responsibility is easy in Finland. When great leaders say they take responsibility, they mean exactly what they mean.
The reporter’s question can be responded to with a classic saying: “We do not comment on individual cases.”
Bureaucracy exists to make power and responsibility visible, but when there is enough bureaucracy it can be used to eliminate the cassette culture that still exists, in which a big enough actor can do almost anything.
We can only wait for this case to be forgotten and hope that strict financial incentives won’t be put in place in the future to do the right thing.
For a public company the size of Stora Enso, millions in compensation for killing thousands of mussels is basically nothing.
Even so, even Green Leaf can’t do it Require This is in addition to recovering state subsidies from those who damage the environment. This would be 10 percent of Stora Enso’s last year.”Rough“From business results, but from special penalties in Finnish.”
At the other extreme of the concept of liability is the United States, where the rules of the game are set for companies, fought in court, and fined, while insurance is sold to individuals in case someone slips on a mopped floor in a shopping mall and claims compensation.
You may be able to find a balance between these two models.
Most importantly, fines and other punishments offer little comfort. The worst thing about the Finnish lack of accountability is that it breeds cynicism and erodes confidence in society.
No one can do anything about it. No one can gain anything from it. It can’t go on like this.
Hans Sohlström, CEO of Stora Enso. Antti Manama
[ad_2]
Source link
