[ad_1]
La Libertad Avanza (LLA) Representative Lourdes Arrieta He warned on Monday that he feared for his life but assured that “he would not abandon his bench” If she is kicked out of the Libertarian Group, “she will exit” the bench with her head held high because she knows she is telling the truth.
His remarks took place a day ago LLA judge discusses his expulsion After he filed a complaint against the Speaker of the House, Martin MenemControversy over controversial visit to repressive forces at Ezeiza prison.
Dictators don’t like this.
Professional and critical journalism practice is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That is why it troubles those who think they are in possession of the truth.
Moreover, in the new chapter after the crisis The visit organized by the Deputy Minister Bennett Beltran To the soldiers convicted of crimes against humanity, Arrieta spreads the word about projects aimed at providing freedom to those convicted of genocide and once again attacked his fellow substitute.
At the same time, in the statement Radio is with yousaid the adjutant He told Judge Ernesto Creprai that he “feared for his life.” Because it comes from Las Heras in Mendoza, where “these things are not experienced.”
However, when asked if she planned to quit legislative activity, she said she was “not planning to give up banking, that’s ruled out,” adding: “If they deport me, I will leave with my head held high because I know I am telling the truth.”
He was also asked about his opinion on the version of the Presidential Secretary General. Karina MileyHe was ordered to be expelled, to which he responded:He never called me, and I don’t think he dared, it would be an insult to his name. “I think people in the executive branch are afraid to say ‘this is or this is not.'”
She also mentioned the move to release the perpetrators because they wanted her to “For conducting institutional visits and telling the truth, we as representatives are being punished”“Some of the people involved want to do this type of project,” he said.
“We don’t know what other types of interests might be behind all this, but They are damaging the president’s image. Javier MileyHe added. He also complained that critical thinking was not allowed, noting that “they want to silence us at all costs, and I don’t know from whom this downgrade comes”.
Arrieta leaks liberal genocide bill involving liberal representatives
Apart from, Arrieta leaked a series of projects and draft presidential decrees Liberal legislators are committed to Freeing repressors imprisoned for crimes against humanityafter his chat logs were released, he fully exposed his colleagues on the bench Organizing visits to convicted former soldiers.
One of the bills is titled “Reasonable period“, search Release those genocide perpetrators convicted of crimes against humanity during the last dictatorship Twenty years after the crime, they remain in custody.
Lourdes Arrieta leaked the chat and told the repressors details of the visit
The draft document states: “Incorporate Article 59, paragraph 8, of the Argentine Criminal Code No. 11,179, which reads as follows: “Twenty years have elapsed since the State became aware of the commission of a crime through procedural conduct, but no final judicial determination of the crime has been made during that period”“.
so, initiative The maximum period is considered to be 20 years”Going beyond the conclusions reached to date in domestic and international case lawlife cycle, the maximum period of statute of limitations for criminal proceedings provided for in Article 62. CP 2 commits a crime punishable by life imprisonment. ”
On the other hand, the legislators also issued a decree seeking Milley’s approval, which was Representatives of Liberalism After a meeting with Father Javier Oliveira Ravasi and a team of lawyers specializing in this matter. According to the details in the article, Its aim is to secure the freedom of former soldiers who remain in prison 25 years after committing crimes..
“Whatever standard may be laid down by each State or Federal court as to the time within which a warrant must be brought to trial, or as to the time within which a citizen’s rights must be determined, The maximum duration of criminal proceedings is set at 25 yearsThey argued in the first article. Likewise, they formally stipulated that “the maximum period set will be reached for proceedings concerning crimes against humanity that have not yet received a final judgment.”
Likewise, they point out that the term “will take effect from the date of the crime committed, or from the age of majority if the victim is a minor, and its calculation will be suspended if the State suffers a disruption in democratic life due to the unlawful removal of its three powers by the authorities”. “Once this maximum period has expired, non-survival criminal proceedings will terminate”pointing out the initiative.
After the spread, Arrieta clarified that these intentions were not “On a benevolent agenda” And insisted that the projects had “nothing to do with liberal ideals.” “I will not allow the law to be manipulated behind Milley’s back”he concluded.
Megabytes/Bytes
[ad_2]
Source link
