[ad_1]
It is the Social Democratic proposal for a 35-hour work week, launched by former minister Annika Strandhäll and others on DN Debatt, in deceptive packaging. Last week. A year-long study will involve 5,000 participants to find out the effects on health and productivity – as if they are particularly interested in numbers and empirical evidence.
Because what would such a study yield? Much the same results as many similar products that have been produced. Participants generally responded that they liked having less work. There didn’t seem to be much to say about the socio-economic and national fiscal impacts.
But such Aren’t you particularly interested? When Swedish industry appeared calculate If the whole thing costs 8% of GDP per year in the long run, then it would be considered aScary numbers” However, they have nothing of their own to offer.
But it has been decided: this study is not the basis for deciding whether to implement reduced working hours, but just a decoration.
It’s a bit like the right wing in the 90s when they introduced big tax cuts. They were too lazy to fund the party in the budget because the dynamic effect would pay for it.
Strandhäll and Co think that reduced sick leave and increased productivity will make the whole thing pay off. It’s a bit like when the right wing introduced big tax cuts in the 90s. They were too lazy to fund the party in the budget because the dynamic effects would pay for it.
The general The fact that shorter working hours are costly is not in itself a reason not to do it. Parties may propose expensive reforms because they would bring other benefits. But the costs are usually then calculated and compared with other priorities.
Huge investments are needed in the next decade on climate change. Defences must be upgraded. There are rumours that the state has borrowed large sums for this purpose. So should we also increase chalk leave at the same time?
Does this mean our workload will remain the same forever? Of course not. A lot has happened since the 40-hour workweek was introduced in 1973. We got an extra week of vacation. Paid parental leave was extended from six to 16 months.
Another thing that has happened since 1973 is that we have moved rapidly from an industrial society to a service and information society. People’s jobs and workplaces look much more different. General solutions don’t work well. Thankfully, Sweden has a unique party model that lends itself to industry-specific solutions. It has proven very effective in shortening working hours – already less than 40 hours a week in many parts of the economy.
But it is Welfare workers. Didn’t the nurses’ strike this summer show the limits of negotiation?
If S wants to shorten the working hours of nursing and social care professions, this can be done in the cities and regions you are involved in managing. If you realise that it is costly for them to manage it themselves, you can push for the state to pay for it.
In this case, it is hard to blame Swedish business and its terrible numbers.The union’s counterpart is the Swedish Association of Municipalities and Regions (SKR), which is chaired by Annika Strandhäll’s party mate Anders Henriksson.
If S wants to shorten the working hours of nursing and social care professions, this can be done in the cities and regions you are involved in managing. If you realise that it is costly for them to manage it themselves, you can push for the state to pay for it.
This would also cost a lot, but it would be cheaper than reducing everyone’s working hours, and would also benefit those who are truly struggling.
The proposal is Universal shortening of working hours is still only a concept. The S party board and congress will take office this autumn. They have every reason to throw it in the trash, as it would cost a lot not only for Sweden but also for the Social Democrats.
That is, Ulf Kristersson, in his fight for the free-thinking “Magda moderates” in the big cities, would rather stab Magdalena Andersson in the head with one hand with the Left Party and make leftist proposals for shorter working hours with the other.
Also read:
DN Editorial Board: Save surströmmingen, KD – It’s a Swedish tradition
DN Editorial Board: The government’s nuclear power plan is a huge happiness calculation
[ad_2]
Source link
