[ad_1]
Beautiful climate, beautiful people, great food and great location, but weak economic and political institutions. Rather than being diverse, these institutions are given green, purple, orange, yellow or red depending on election results and the distribution of ministries. Some institutions are more about maintaining power than economic growth because people don’t want to miss out on the low-hanging fruit. These institutions also seem to be more focused on importing rather than manufacturing goods.
Suriname has a small population, low education and low productivity, which poses a serious obstacle to absorbing a large number of industrial enterprises. There is little technical capacity building – how many students sign up to study science, mathematics, chemistry, engineering? There are beautiful “bromki dyari” here, but also poisonous plants whose roots generate racial resentment. There are too many “national days”. Three are enough: commemorating the slavery past, immigrants day and indigenous peoples day.
Suriname had 20 political parties participating in the last election. The picture is not very clear to voters, who already cannot see the forest for the trees. The Netherlands should have about 572 political parties per inhabitant (but there are only 26). For Suriname, three or four parties are enough to represent 600,000 inhabitants. Only new parties with a clearly large number of supporters can participate independently. The rest would be better off to gather together or be absorbed into an existing large group.
Political parties in Suriname give or have given suspects or criminals ample opportunities to hold high political positions. One party appointed a criminal as honorary president and used large sums of money to elect a new board of directors. The fugitive former president and former party chairman missed the opportunity to report to the authorities to clear their morals and put the country first.
There is a spirit of “vagicracy” in Suriname, but not much has been achieved. There is no guarantee that “vagicracy” (female governance) will be better, but “the test of the pudding is in the eating.” But before a woman can be elected president, she must also show her double eggs.
Suriname has structural problems that outlast all governments. On paper everyone is against “family and friends”, but who doesn’t use it in practice? There is also no long-term planning, but economic growth does not “fall from coconut trees”. Just like pregnancy, growth is slow, it takes a while to hear the baby’s first cry, and you have to endure some things before that. Then you have to support and raise the child. But a mentality that focuses on immediate satisfaction of desires rather than rational decision-making focused on long-term rewards does not bring growth. The mentality of enjoying first and working later creates poverty.
Surinamese directors turn back the clock every five years, same text, same scenes, different actors and different accents, as if history turns a blind eye and stupid things repeat themselves. Therefore, the government irresponsibly borrows and prints money to maintain its irresponsible lifestyle and replenish the deficit. Corruption is the norm, so the country has been cheated for years by multinational companies, which, with the support of government officials, sell raw materials for free. There are incompetent ministers and DNA members who need the first four years to learn the industry, but do not show it. Thousands of civil servants are redundant, and their incompetence does not solve the problem, but increases it.
Suriname is prone to crime, which is likely to be related to poor single-parent families and teenage mothers from an epidemiological perspective. All forms of crime are dealt with gently. The lush flora and fauna and wild hospitality are beautiful, but the lack of discipline, unclear morals, weak infrastructure, rampant criminal gangs and polluted living environment have deterred investors.
Suriname has a free press, but sometimes this freedom is threatened by government officials who want to issue some kind of fatwa against the “evil media”. Due to a series of mistakes, the government has gained a reputation that “everything is questionable”. The president should set up an Error Bureau to collect and discuss mistakes.
Suriname passed a good state decree on land conversion, making ownership real estate. Many things are going well too. The president saved Suriname, but obviously did not save the Surinamese. There are many complaints. The complaint is affected by inflation. People want an economic growth of 2.5% and a 50% increase in purchasing power. The message to the next president is: maintain or at least improve the macroeconomic stability achieved, otherwise the sacrifices made today will be in vain.
With so many raw materials, Suriname has the potential to be a global economic winner, but it lacks a strong punch.
D. Balradsin
[ad_2]
Source link
